<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Accessibility's topics - tribe.net</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://accessibility-obsessifs.tribe.net/threads/atom" />
  <subtitle>Tribe.net. Local Connections</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <title>Best automated accessibility checkers?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://accessibility-obsessifs.tribe.net/thread/1ea7bab2-1f9c-40d3-b49b-7260cad1da3f" />
    <author>
      <name>rex84</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://accessibility-obsessifs.tribe.net/thread/1ea7bab2-1f9c-40d3-b49b-7260cad1da3f</id>
    <updated>2004-09-13T17:37:10Z</updated>
    <published>2004-09-13T17:37:10Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;Greetings! Anyone have any experience or opinions related to WCAG/508 checkers that can spider large sites and provide reports etc?
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Currently looking at LIFT Online (or LIFT Machine), AccVerify Pro. Any others I should consider?
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Thanks.&lt;/div&gt;
				&lt;div&gt;
			posted in
			&lt;a href="http://accessibility-obsessifs.tribe.net"&gt;Accessibility&lt;/a&gt;
			- 0 replies
		&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>rex84</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-09-13T17:37:10Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>



